Low Cut Jeans

what are they?

Low-rise jeans have a deliberately low-cut waist intended to sit low on, or below, the hips. They are also known as lowcut jeans, hipsters, hip-huggers and lowriders. Low-rise jeans are intentionally cut lower on the waist, thus covering less body on front (the belly) and the back. Usually the jeans sits at least three inches lower than the belly button.

History

Although low-rise jeans have existed since the

1960s, their renewed popularity among young women, and the subsequent trends they inspired (i.e. the whale tail and lower back tattoo), were one of the earliest phenomena that distinguished the popular fashion of the 2000s from that of the 1990s.

In Jordan

I can see many many girls in Jordan wearing lowcut jeans,without even thinking if they suit them or not.and the new trend is to wear a matching thong or Gstring(see above picture)

I even saw jeans in a shop with fake thongs on the back,with buttons to remove or keep or change colors when necessary..as if it's OK for underwear to show!!

Girls with kalabeez and karsh showing,not very attractive!!

Medical Concerns!!

Wearing low cut jeans puts pressure on a sensory nerve, which can cause pain and paresthesia in the nerve's area of distribution. This is known as Meralgia paresthetica, they also make legs look shorter,less attractive and with the pressure on the belly,love handles (term for a layer of fat that is deposited around a person's midsection, especially visible on the sides, which is believed to have some resemblance to handles) are more obvious if they were not intially triggered by the use of such jeans.

still want to wear them?

Legal Matters

In USA,Legislator Derrick Shepherd of the state of Louisiana in the USA made an attempt in 2004 to outlaw the fashion of lowrise jeans, particularly to bring a halt to the display of underwear under the pants, claiming it to be disrespectful and obscene.

People still spotted with their "whale tail" would be fined $500. This bill (HB 1703) was rejected by the Louisiana House, however. a similar bill was attempted in Virginia, USA, putting a $50 fine on anyone deliberately showing their underwear.

The bill was rejected in February 2005.

Further conservative reactions come from schools, putting a particular dress code on their students, not allowing them to wear pants below a certain area of their body, or displaying underwear.

so

what did we do?..

did anyone object?